False humility, logical fallacies and being bored with certainty

speech

There are some areas of life and the Christian faith where the smartest thing you can do is to hold your position with a certain… latitude. It tends to go wrong when you dig your heels in and you won’t recognize that there are other valid points of view. One that immediately jumps to mind is end-times theology, of course, but there are others. Granted most are typically of lesser importance in comparison to something like eschatology, like church polity or music styles. Things where we can disagree as friends, and don’t necessarily have to break fellowship with one another.

Getting this right tends to be tricky, as we all know. Many of us have read stories or have actually met people who’ve been involved in church splits over things that ultimately didn’t matter that much, or seen friendships dissolve over a misunderstanding. So it’s no wonder that there are many who just throw their hands up in the air and declare, “Maybe our problem is having positions.”

Bored with certainty

A while back, this was the approach of Shane Hipps, a well-known speaker and author, when he wrote about his views on the afterlife in the wake of the Love Wins scandal. He felt that, rather than having positions on things such as the afterlife (and most everything else for that matter), we should consider possibilities only. Because we haven’t died, we can’t know for certain what happens, or so the logic goes. If someone tells us something, or the Bible seems to say it, then it’s a possibility, as he put it. It’s what we believe might be the case. But it only becomes a position once we experience it.

This again came to the forefront in recent days as I read statements by Kent Dobson as he resigned from his post as teaching pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church (himself the successor to Hipps, who was the successor to Rob Bell). He described himself as always having been drawn to the “very edges of religion and faith and God,” and not knowing “if we know what we mean by God anymore.” He’s not drawn to orthodox Christianity, though he is very much drawn to the mainstream of culture as a whole.[1. Dustin Messer’s article on Dobson’s announcement is well worth reading, by the way.]

The views Hipps, Dobson and countless others express point to one conclusion: that certainty is boring, at least in the eyes of some. If you’re drawn to the edges of faith, or you believe that experience determines what is true, then it becomes borderline impossible to be certain about anything. Thus, having defined positions becomes a problem.

Of course, so does making a coherent argument for your position against positions.

False humility and logical fallacies

See, the difficulty with trying to live in the in-between spaces, to eschew firm positions and embrace possibilities, or whatever sort of language a person chooses to use, is the entire argument is built upon faulty reasoning—the notion that you can make a statement rooted in certain knowledge (even if that knowledge is faulty), all the while believing that certain knowledge is not something we can have.

It’s a nonsensical idea because everyone makes certain statements—everyone has positions. It’s just that sometimes our positions are wrong.[2. Case in point.]

When it comes to theology, when it comes faith, we can’t not have positions, particularly theological ones. After all, to say “God created the world in six days” is a theological position. Likewise, saying “Mankind came about via an evolutionary process” is also a theological position. Similarly, “It is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment” is a theological position, as is, “Salvation is possible for everyone, even if they don’t know the name of Jesus.”

Even to say “I don’t think we should have theological positions, just possibilities,” is a position. The problem is, it’s a nonsense. In the same way, being drawn to the “excitement” of the edges of faith isn’t really being bold and courageous—it’s just being worldly. And so is false humility.

Embracing humble confidence

Humility and confidence are not enemies. They never have been. Yet too often we see people—out of what I hope is a desire to be kind and loving, and seeking to create opportunities for people to know Jesus—treat them as polar opposites. And so, embracing a faulty line of reasoning, positions become possibilities, certainty becomes speculation, and truth becomes opinion.

But this is not what God wants for us. Whether we’re attracted to the edges or whether we’re firmly rooted in orthodoxy, he wants us to pursue a humble confidence—one that is rooted in the knowledge that all we can know comes from him. That understands we’re never going to get Christianity all figured out, or perfectly know the Bible. In fact, the longer we live, and the deeper we go in our faith, the more we realize how little we actually know.

But even so, he wants us to truly know him, to come to a greater understanding of him, and to be transformed by that knowledge (Rom. 12:2). This is why he inspired the Scriptures—to make us wise for salvation and to equip us for every good work (2 Tim 3:15-17). To no longer act in ignorance, but as obedient children to grow in holiness (1 Pet. 1:14).

This glorifies and pleases him greatly. And there is nothing more exciting, nothing more humbling, nothing more personally challenging—and ultimately, nothing more rewarding—than this pursuit.

Posted by Aaron Armstrong

Aaron is the author of several books including the Big Truths Bible Storybook, Epic Devotions, Awaiting a Savior: The Gospel, the New Creation, and the End of Poverty, and Contend: Defending the Faith in a Fallen World. His next book, published by Lexham Press, will release in Spring 2023.